Minimal Abstract Algebra

This is a challenge !!!!!

There are three objects, A, B, and C, and an operation called “doesn’t have a name”.
Two are similar, and the third is a bit different
They are paired to yield a single object as follows:

AA = BB = CC = C
AB = BC = CA = B
AC = CB = BA = A

Notice that BC and CB are different, so non-abelian.
Worse is that (AC)A = C and A(CA) = B are different, so non-associative.
And consequently A and B and C are different.

Your job is to identify (model, in current jargon) the objects and the operation.”

The next post will be “the solution”.

Advertisements

1 Comment

Filed under abstract, algebra, Uncategorized

One response to “Minimal Abstract Algebra

  1. I was thinking of some simple matrices and multiplication, like Pauli’s spin matrices, but then C would have to be the identity matrix and the operation would have to be associative.
    But I would still try with some matrices: These are three equations for three matrices, so for arbitrary 2×2 matrices there would be 12 equations in total for 12 numbers (or everything doubled for complex numbers). If something still does not work out right I would add one more dimension and try to solve 27 equations for 27 numbers. But even in these cases, associativity should hold – so matrix multplication is the wrong guess, and probably something odd happens when trying to solve these equations….

My wordpress emails suddenly disappeared last night ??????

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s